A few days on from the Community Pharmacy x General Practice Summit, I’m still struck by what happened in that room. Not because we cracked the code of primary care overnight, and not because we unveiled some shiny new national programme. It was something far simpler, and far more powerful. We got frontline clinicians from two professions who are too often pitted against each other to sit side by side, talk openly, share frustrations, laugh, disagree, and start imagining what could be different. I also have to say now that it wouldn’t have been possible without my colleagues across Londonwide LMCs, Community Pharmacy London and the NHS Confederation.

If you’ve worked in primary care for longer than ten minutes, you’ll know the script: pharmacy blames general practice for workload dumping; general practice blames pharmacy for capacity gaps or miscommunication; commissioners talk about integration while funding models keep us in separate boxes. It’s not antagonism, it’s exhaustion and design flaws.

So when we started planning this event months ago, we didn’t want another polite panel discussion. We wanted GPs and pharmacists to see each other as people again. To name the stuff that doesn’t work. To call out the myths that shape poor behaviour. And most of all, to show what collaboration looks like when it’s not forced, formalised, or wrapped in twenty pages of governance paperwork.

Why we did it

The need is obvious. The NHS won’t survive the next decade unless primary care starts functioning as an ecosystem, not a collection of silos. The GP contract and the community pharmacy contract may be chalk and cheese, but the patients are the same. They don’t care which bit of primary care sorts their problem; they just expect us to know what each other is doing.

We also knew that collaboration is often strong where real relationships exist, at neighbourhood level, between the pharmacist who pops into the surgery to sort an inhaler issue, or the GP who calls the pharmacy to troubleshoot a repeat. Those happen despite the system, not because of it. The summit was designed to bring those examples out of the shadows and show they’re not anomalies; they’re models we should be replicating.

How we approached it

Our biggest decision was to lean into honesty. Not the sanitised version you get in formal stakeholder meetings, but the kind of honesty that comes out when a pharmacist and a GP end up hiding in the dispensary together to escape a hectic practice corridor. That story, told on stage by one of the speakers, summed up the whole day: people make collaboration work long before systems catch up.

We curated a programme that deliberately mixed perspectives: contractors, LMC leads, ICB executives, national NHS leaders, frontline clinicians, those already collaborating, and those sceptical of the whole concept. The panel on “Collaborating Whilst Competing” set the tone, it tackled the elephant in the room head-on. Pharmacy and general practice don’t always want the same things. Contracts incentivise different priorities. Workforce shortages mean every organisation is protecting its own survival. Ignoring that tension would have killed the credibility of the day.

We also kept structure light. Generous breaks, networking, exhibitor conversations, not filler, but intentional. Because the real magic wasn’t on stage; it was the GP who suddenly realised a local pharmacist was dealing with 150 walk-ins a day, or the pharmacist who had no idea the practice down the road had lost two partners and three receptionists this year. Those moments shift mindsets more effectively than any keynote ever will.

What happened on the day

You could feel the atmosphere shift as soon as the early debates kicked off. People dropped their professional defensiveness. GPs admitted that some of their scepticism about Pharmacy First was fuelled by incomplete understanding of what community pharmacy can clinically deliver. Pharmacists acknowledged that communication gaps sometimes escalate because no one has built the relationship needed to pick up the phone.

The myth-busting session was refreshingly blunt. We confronted long-standing narratives, that pharmacists “just dispense”, that GPs “won’t share power”, that integration is code for shifting workload without shifting resource. The room didn’t shy away from those tensions, and that’s exactly why the conversations felt so productive.

But the standout theme was the celebration of genuine collaboration already happening. We heard about pharmacists working from practice rooms a few days a week, joint headache pathways redesigned by both professions, shared care models that reduced duplication, and neighbourhood teams that simply stopped waiting for permission and built systems that worked for their population. Relationship-based integration isn’t hypothetical; it’s real, and it’s happening quietly all over the country.

What’s next

We’re not naïve. One summit doesn’t override a decade of structural separation. But it proved that when you bring people together at scale, without an agenda beyond building trust, something shifts. The conversations were raw, constructive, and grounded in reality. And they’ve already sparked follow-up work across multiple boroughs.

For areas thinking about doing something similar, my advice is simple:

• Get the right people in the room – frontline clinicians first, system leaders second.
• Strip out the jargon – speak plainly about the operational pressures on both sides.
• Surface the real pain points – competition, communication, capacity gaps.
• Showcase practical examples – nothing inspires change like seeing someone else already doing it.
• Make space for relationships – that’s where the real integration happens.

Primary care is stretched to breaking point. But days like this remind me that the solution isn’t another restructure or another national directive. It’s people, Community Pharmacists and GPs, deciding to work together because they share a purpose. The system should be shaped around that, not the other way round.